One model across DSPs
The Trade Desk, DV360 and Amazon DSP reporting in one place.
Programmatic & CTV
Programmatic and connected TV generate the most data and the least clarity. We ingest DSP reporting and log-level feeds, model reach and frequency across screens, and design the measurement that tells you whether upper-funnel spend actually moved anything.
What you get
The Trade Desk, DV360 and Amazon DSP reporting in one place.
Deduplicated reach and frequency across CTV, display, audio and social.
Geo holdouts, since click attribution does not apply to CTV.
Inventory and supply path analysis, with what each cost.
The problem
CTV has no click, so the entire measurement approach used for search and social simply does not transfer. DSP interfaces report delivery well and outcomes poorly. Log-level data holds the real answers about frequency, overlap and inventory quality, but arrives as very large raw files that most teams never process. The predictable result is that a growing share of budget is defended with reach and impression counts rather than any evidence of incremental effect.
What we build for programmatic
How we work
Ingest DSP reporting first to establish a reliable delivery and cost baseline
Add log-level processing where it exists, since frequency and overlap live there
Model deduplicated reach across screens rather than summing per-channel reach
Design and read out a geo holdout to establish incremental effect
What we use
FAQ
With experiments rather than attribution. Geo holdouts are the workhorse: withhold CTV spend in matched markets and measure the difference in outcomes. Where a clean room is available, exposure-level analysis adds detail. What does not work is treating an incidental site visit after an ad impression as a conversion path, which is how most CTV attribution overstates itself.
If you are spending seriously on programmatic, yes. It is the only place true cross-campaign frequency, audience overlap and supply path detail exist. Aggregated reporting cannot tell you, for example, that 30% of your budget reached people already saturated at a frequency of 15, and that kind of finding usually pays for the work.
That is normally the point. Everything lands in the same warehouse and model, so reach and frequency at the top can be read against conversions at the bottom. It also makes marketing mix modeling viable, which is the most reliable way to value upper-funnel spend.
Go deeper
Guide
What marketing mix modeling is, when it beats attribution, how open-source frameworks like Meridian and Robyn work, and what it takes to build an MMM that earns trust.
Read the guideGuide
Retail media spend is spread across Amazon, Walmart, Instacart, and more, each with its own dashboard. Here's how to build one data model across all of them.
Read the guideRelated
Meridian or Robyn models fed by your own pipeline, to measure what each channel contributes.
Learn moreYour attribution platform in the same warehouse as spend and sales, on one agreed model.
Learn moreAmazon Ads API, SP-API and AMC pipelines, dashboards and AI agents.
Learn moreDelta Lake pipelines, log-level processing and ML on the same platform.
Learn moreTell us which DSPs you run and whether you get log-level feeds, and we will scope the measurement build.